In his article MTV
Smut Peddlers: Targeting Kids with Sex, Drugs and Alcohol, Casey
Williams writes, It has been a year since Janet Jackson deliberately
exposed her breast to a world-wide audience that included millions of
unsuspecting children during the MTV-produced 2004 Super Bowl halftime
show.
This quote to me reveals the utter lunacy of some of my
friends on the cultural conservative side of things (I count myself
firmly in that number): how many tens of millions of times is the female
breast exposed to children every day in the act of breast-feeding?
It’s not the exposure which is offensive (indeed, I can’t
see that there is much wrong with non-sexual nudity in general), but
rather the context. The infant who suckles at his
mother’s breast is not harmed; the child who sees a couple
hooking up
is.
Later Mr. Williams writes, Parents witnessed first-hand the
incessant crotch-grabbing and revealing clothing, the dangerous mixture
of aggression and sexuality, and the relentless sexual simulation and
stimulation that characterise MTV's programming.
That’s the
real problem. It’s not whether or not a very particular
body part is shown; it’s the context in which it is shown. There
is nothing at all sexual about Kathy Bates; there’s a great deal
attractive about Amanda Peet. Likewise, it’s not the breast per
se but the crotch-grabbing, the freaking
, the degradation of man
and woman &c. which are so offensive.
Sex and sexuality are good things in their place; so too are violence
and aggression (if you disagree, try fighting a tiger or wolf without
them…)—it’s their misuse and misdirection which is so
distressing. The current culture, though, twists good things to
perverse ends. As Exhibit A, I present hip-hop. Now, music and dancing
have always been ways for young men and young women to attract one
another. This is the nature of things. But recently we have seen a new
phenomenon. If the waltz, big band and doo-wop (and, in fact, every
previous form of music) were music for making love, rock-and-roll was
music for having sex (the name itself came from a euphemism
therefor…); and now we have hip-hop, music
for rutting
like beasts. Where the older forms at least paid lip-service to love,
rock & roll was all about lust—but hip-hop isn’t even
about that: lust at least has an object, while hip-hop is all about the
self. In its milieu others exist solely to satisfy one’s base
needs, not to spur one onto higher things.
As Exhibit B, I present hip-hop (it’s bad enough to require
double-treatment). Dulce et decorum est pro patria
mori, certainly: sweet and proper it is to die (and by extension,
kill) for one’s country. But where older sentiments extolled
violence as a means to good ends, semi-recent culture loved it as a
thing unto itself, and hip-hop extols cruelty as an end. There
are beasts which kill for sport (cats leap to mind), true, but they are
few and far between, and until recently we despised them for it. The
rap culture is about barbarity and cruelty not for defence of wife &
children; not for love of country; not even for prevention of worse
evil—but for love of barbarism.
I understand that the Greeks developed a philosophical system in
which every vice was considered a perverted virtue: lust is perverted
love; pride is perverted pleasure in doing a proper job; greed is
perverted self-preservation and so on (there are better names for the
Græco-Roman virtues, but I cannot remember them). The problem
with the modern world is that we elevate the vices into virtues. In our
age lust is laudable; pride is something to be proud of; greed is
good.
If rock and roll reduced men to the level of their feelings (not that
feelings in themselves are bad), modern music
(if that term can
even be applied to a mish-mash of tones, without logic, form or reason)
reduces men to the level of the animals. But at least the beasts of the
field have an excuse: they were not created for any great destiny or
purpose. But we were made in the image and likeness of God, made to
worship and become like unto Him—and our perversion of His visage
is foul indeed.