Friday’s issue of the Rocky Mountain New featured
the headline She Said No
in reference, of course, to the Kobe
Bryant rape trial. Now, I should preface my remarks with a note that
IMHO rape is the worst of crimes, worse even than murder, and that it
should be a capital offence. But I also hold justice to be among the
highest of ideals—and part of justice is the principle that the
accused is innocent until proven guilty. In fact, until he has been
proven guilty, he is the innocent and therefore his accuser is
the guilty party, for his reputation will never recover, no matter what
the truth about the crime in question.
Is Kobe Bryant (what sort of name for a man is Kobe, anyway?) an
adulterer? Of course. Is Kobe Bryant an overpaid, under-mature
athlete? Obviously. Is he a rapist? That remains to be seen.
And until it has been demonstrated, or he has admitted it, or an
impartial witness can be obtained, then there is no sound basis to claim
that his supposed victim said no. It remains, for the moment, simply a
matter of he-said, she-said. My own opinion is that is probably was
some degree of rape, although almost certainly not the worst
kind—but that’s just an opinion; it’s not fact, and
Bryant could be quite innocent of all but adultery (which is why he will
not get the title Mr.
on my blog)—that’s just not how
I happen to be betting at the moment.
That’s immaterial, though. Until a jury of his peers has found
Bryant guilty of rape, or at least until it has been demonstrated that
the woman in question did, indeed, say no, it is irresponsible for a
newspaper to state that she, in fact, did so do.